It’s an age old question that can apply to many things. Names are something we take for granted, but in reality they are the fundamental basis of all communications. When we think of names we think of what we call one another, our pets, our children and our places. In reality though ever word in every language is in essence a name. Even a verb is the name for an action that takes many words to explain, that is why they all have definitions. Imagine trying to give someone directions without a name for the action of “turn”. Most importantly though, we use names to explain relations. First names, last names, family trees, nationalities, and the names for the relations between these things are what derive and keep order in our world. Even further they are the signposts to how we navigate and determine our possible impact on and place in the world. Names of course vary among languages and regions. Different words (names) are used to describe the same thing in different languages and locations. In the end, regardless of differences in language, the objects and actions being described by their name can be recognized for what they are and the variations in language can be translated.
The scenario where this doesn’t work is in living beings. Verbs can vary in how they are performed, but that can be described with adverbs. Physical objects like rocks or furniture can vary in visible traits or molecular makeup, but that variations are qualified with adjectives to help further describe the object. Even these can easily be recognized visually and translated between languages and cultures because the “name” is essentially the same.
Where absolute accuracy is essential and qualifying additives cannot do justice to a name is when it comes to living beings. When it comes to people, accuracy doesn’t seem to be such a problem because we are all unique and have a free will. We will always act individually even within a community and the genetic heritage of our name has limited capabilities in determining or predicting how we will act. People can even share the same names, but be easily qualified with adjectives or descriptors because every human is distinct. With people and even domesticated animals, the genetic code may vary slightly within our species, but our wills, personalities, relationships and souls make us all easily discernible from one another.
With other less discernible species such as grasses, lichens, trees, fish, birds and non-domesticated animals the species may be discernible as a whole but the identity of individuals within the species is much less clear. More importantly the collective impact or necessity of the species has an even greater effect on the world and nature as a whole. Names of these species describe a collective whose members act on a collective instinct (or possibly conscience) instead of individual free wills. In the end these names represents more than the one. They give insight and understanding into the collective nature and cultural background of the species as a whole.
To answer the the title question: Everything about and everything something and what it impacts is in a name. A good name captures both the essence and esse of what it describes. It captures the traits of what makes the thing being described unique (essence) as well as the intrinsic presence that makes it identifiable for what it is (esse). Where meaning gets lost is when variation occurs in the naming itself rather than the translation of the names. In the plant world people work in both common and botanical names. The botanical name is a Latin based name that is used not only to identify the plant, but also gives insight into the breeding and heritage that led to it’s creation. It is is written in Latin to provide a universal language whose meaning will not be lost in translation world-wide. This allows us to see what the species is, where it has come from genetically, and what it might do in nature or the situation we put it in.
Common names are regional and based on local peoples’ experiences with the plant rather than the culture and cultivation of the plant itself. Common names are extremely descriptive, but subjective and should never be used when striving for accuracy of any kind. There is much debate about what people like to use, and whether the botanical name is important if you are not a professional horticulturist or botanist. However, you really can’t know the plant well enough to responsibly plant in nature or a landscape without the information provided by an accurate botanical name. Common names may tell what a plant has done, but cannot give sure insight of what it is capable of doing. Accurate and exact botanical naming of all species (not just plants) is crucial the the protection of nature itself as well as understanding it. Nothing has been more influential to the spread of invasive species and disease than improper naming that occurs in the commercialization of plants and the mis-education that improper naming provides.
Over the last fifteen years, with the rise of genetic testing, efforts have been underway world-wide to cleanup this mess, and bring order to this problem. The Integrated Taxonomic Information System is one of the efforts that has been working across borders and oceans to make this happen. The ITIS is a collaborative effort of governments and academic systems, that crosses borders and oceans, but is greatly limited by the inertia and limited funding of the respective institutions. There are others that specialized even more into areas such as fungi, cacti, wattles, and regional ecosystems. These groups have a passion and sense of urgency but don’t have cooperative and interconnected systems to make some of this possible. This problem isn’t limited to the plant kingdom, it is pervasive in the animal kingdom as well, and both do relate to one another.
Most of the early misnaming has been created by the limitation of communications. Most botanical naming was done long before the Internet was ever created and the commerce of species became a worldwide phenomenon long before there was a world-wide-web. As a result duplicate species are being sold and shipped with different names throughout the world. Even more damaging, multiple species are being distributed throughout the world with the same name, and this is where the greatest danger lyes. People are shipping and using plants all over the world for uses they are not suited for or with potential impacts that they are totally unaware of. What is in the name they are buying or selling is actually of another name. The greatest responsibility lyes in the breeders and distributors of these species to accurately identify what they are selling, and to accurately identify what they are breeding them from. Unfortunately, until the system is completely cleaned up and connected this cannot be done.
Commercialization has not only led to the spread of misnamed species, but people are breeding new species and varieties from already misnamed species at rates ten times faster than the original species were discovered. When we started Botany Buddy it was created to help communicate and educate between the “classes” (for lack of a better name) of gardeners. The tools we are creating are meant to bring the same language to educators, botanists, growers, purveyors and gardeners in a way that is easily accessed and understood by all. Our original iPhone app was created to educate, communicate, and identify information to the user and for the users to be able to communicate it to each other. In the end it has communicated just as much to us. With users in over twenty counties and on every continent we have communicated with botanists all over the world to help us design our new database and systems.
Just this week we finished proofing the final taxonomic database for the upcoming web based app. With about 60,000 species ACCURATELY represented we can now add data, photos, and even more species to the database and know that we can truly represent the species’ family heritage. When we started this our intent was to add a thousand or so trees at a time, and just build on the library we had in the original app every so often. In the end we realized we needed to add the ones we have now into nature’s library and to create our own Dewey Decimal System to manage it the information in it. As a result our final product will be a tool that has literally “thousands times” more information than our initial release and will be formatted to grow at any given moment and with more accuracy than any other resource I have found in existence. This capability would be totally impossible if it were not for a name.
Personally I like to be a little incognito in my gardening circles. Those who “know” me know not just my name, but my botanical name as well. I would venture to say those who read this blog regularly are probably getting to know me on that level to some extent. The other day I was at garden center and watched someone selling an ornamental grass. This person did not know my botanical name. The customer asked if the plant would spread by seed. The sales person said, “No this is Kirk Alexander Maiden Grass and is a hybrid that was cultivated by a local designer years ago.” I pointed across the highway to about a 1/4 mile long stretch of maiden grass growing in a ditch, and said, “That may be Kirk Alexander in the pot, but those are his parents over there and they didn’t arrive until after Kirk did.” Needless to say they looked at me like I was nuts, but that is what is in a name. If we know where we come from we know where we might go.
People are all hybrids and we may be determined not to become our parents, but it in the end both the best and the worst of them tends to come out in us. Obviously I get my verbosity from my father. He always used to say “the mind cannot absorb more than the seat can endure”, so I will wrap this up. This trait about me you could definitely predict if I had a botanical name. Our naming task has taken far longer, more mental energy, and more patience and determination than almost anything I have ever done. It is and has to be the foundation of everything we do going forward to really be a great reference. I like superlatives, and this may be the most important and responsible work I have done in the last thirty years and hope will help the world for hundreds of years to come. That is what is in a name. 